Crypto Regulations in the US—A Complete Guide (2025)
Learn how the current legislative crypto framework functions in the US and how it may change in the future in this article.
Learn how the current legislative crypto framework functions in the US and how it may change in the future in this article.
The US cryptocurrency regulatory landscape has changed quite a bit lately. With President Donald Trump returning to the White House in 2025, his administration is adopting a pro-crypto stance and pushing for aggressive deregulation at the federal level, which is shaking things up in the crypto world. One of the most headline-grabbing moves so far is the Strategic Bitcoin Reserve and United States Digital Asset Stockpile, showing the intent to treat digital assets as a national strategic priority.
Key regulatory bodies—such as the Department of Justice’s National Cryptocurrency Enforcement Team—have been disbanded, and the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) appears to be loosening its grip, even dropping major lawsuits against well-known crypto companies such as Gemini and Coinbase.
This shift brings a mix of opportunities and challenges. On the one hand, this deregulatory approach could spark innovation and growth in the crypto sector. On the flip side, it raises some serious concerns about consumer protection, financial stability, and the risk of more criminal activity as a result of the weakened regulatory oversight.
In this guide, we’ll take a closer look at the federal licensing requirements, review the current state of US crypto regulations, and explore how recent legal changes and the administration’s policies are affecting the industry and what it all means for the future.
At the federal level, the regulation of cryptocurrency-related activities in the United States is grounded in the application of existing financial laws to digital assets, leading to inconsistencies due to the unique nature of digital assets. Entities engaged in the exchange, transfer, or custody of cryptocurrencies are typically classified as Money Services Businesses (MSBs) and must register with the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN). Such entities must implement comprehensive Anti-Money Laundering and Countering the Financing of Terrorism (AML/CFT) programs, conduct customer identification procedures (KYC), submit Suspicious Activity Reports (SARs), and comply with the Travel Rule, which mandates the transmission of specific information during virtual asset transactions.
Beyond FinCEN, several federal agencies exert regulatory authority over different aspects of the cryptocurrency sector. The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) treats certain digital assets as securities and enforces compliance with applicable securities laws. The Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) classifies certain cryptocurrencies, such as Bitcoin, as commodities and oversees derivative markets based on these assets. Additionally, the Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) mandates compliance with US sanctions programs, requiring companies to screen clients and counterparties against designated lists.
Overall, US federal policy seeks to integrate cryptocurrencies into the existing financial regulatory framework while prioritizing financial security, investor protection, and the prevention of illicit activities. You can find below aspects of federal regulation in more detail.
Note that local regulations may vary from state to state. Therefore, state-level legal requirements should be subject to separate review.
The US has a variety of federal institutions regulating digital assets. The exact institution in charge will depend on whether an asset is a money transmitter, security, or commodity/derivative. The main ones include:
Several government agencies, while not directly regulating digital assets, contribute through related guidelines and initiatives:
Note: Other Federal authorities can also regulate specific issues related to digital assets. The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) regulates taxation of digital assets, and the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) issues guidance allowing banks to custody digital assets and use stablecoins for payments under certain conditions, etc.
From New York’s BitLicense to Wyoming’s crypto-friendly laws, state-level regulation in the US is anything but uniform, making location a key factor for crypto platforms and their customers alike.
* This list of crypto-friendly and strict states has been created by Sumsub based on our own research, analysis, and subjective judgment. It is intended for informational and general reference purposes only.
The following states are considered to be more crypto-friendly than others in the US:
While some states foster crypto innovation, others have implemented rigorous regulatory frameworks that pose challenges for digital asset businesses.
At the federal level, several US agencies oversee different aspects of cryptocurrency activities. Each agency’s jurisdiction depends on the nature of the business and the classification of the digital assets. Below is a breakdown by regulatory authority, indicating which businesses are affected, under what circumstances, and what type of registration, license, or compliance is required.
Regulates businesses involved in the transmission of money, including cryptocurrencies, under the Bank Secrecy Act (BSA).
Affected businesses:
When? When a business accepts and transmits value that substitutes for currency or provides money transmission services.
Required authorization: Registration as a Money Services Business (MSB).
No formal license issued; instead, registration and adherence to ongoing AML/CFT compliance obligations are mandatory.
Regulates businesses dealing with financial instruments classified as securities under US law, including certain digital assets.
Affected businesses:
When? When digital assets meet the Howey Test criteria and are considered “investment contracts” or otherwise qualify as securities.
Required authorization:
It regulates businesses involved with commodities and derivatives related to digital assets under the Commodity Exchange Act (CEA).
Affected businesses:
When?
Required authorization:
Navigating the US crypto regulatory landscape in 2025 remains complex, with a mix of federal rules and diverse state-level laws. While federal regulations have been rolled back, individual states continue to enforce their own distinct requirements, which impacts how crypto businesses approach licensing and compliance. This means that what’s true in one state may not be true in another, making it essential for crypto companies to stay informed about the different rules.
While federal crypto regulation in the US is complex and evolving, a methodical approach to identifying applicable business activities and following the right registration path will ensure a strong legal foundation. In many cases, registration involves not just filing forms, but also building internal compliance infrastructure that satisfies ongoing regulatory obligations.
Please note that in each case, you should check your state regulations and requirements.
In 2025, anti-money laundering (AML) and countering the financing of terrorism (CFT) requirements will continue to be a core element of the regulatory framework for cryptocurrency businesses operating in the United States. Crypto companies are classified as financial institutions under BSA and are primarily overseen by the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN).
Importantly, AML/CFT obligations are not limited to companies registered as MSBs with FinCEN. Cryptocurrency businesses regulated by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC)—such as crypto trading platforms handling security tokens, alternative trading systems (ATS), futures commission merchants (FCMs), and swap dealers—must also establish and maintain AML programs in accordance with applicable laws and regulations. These entities are subject to parallel or additional AML compliance obligations under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Commodity Exchange Act (CEA), and associated regulations.
As of April 2025, the US crypto regulations are significantly changing. The Trump administration is taking a hands-off approach, trying to encourage innovation in the crypto space, though this has sparked some worries about how things will be monitored and enforced. At the same time, Congress is looking into new laws to bring some clarity and organization to the world of digital assets.
Several key federal initiatives and proposals are shaping the future of crypto regulation:
Several emerging trends are influencing the trajectory of crypto compliance:
Suggested read: Regulatory Sandboxes—a Bridge Between Regulators and Business Innovation
Identity verification continues to be a cornerstone of AML/KYC compliance for crypto businesses.
Suggested read: KYC and AML—Key Differences and Best Practices
To maintain compliance with AML/KYC regulations, crypto companies should follow this checklist, which includes the most important requirements:
By adhering to these practices, crypto companies can navigate the regulatory environment effectively, safeguarding their operations.
Suggested read: Customer Due Diligence (CDD): The Process and Its Types
In the US, Travel Rule compliance for cryptocurrency transactions falls under the Bank Secrecy Act and is enforced by FinCEN. In 2025, it remains a requirement for all Virtual Asset Service Providers (VASPs)—including crypto exchanges, custodians, and wallet providers—to collect, store, and transmit personally identifiable information (PII) for transactions of $3,000 or more.
This includes:
These requirements apply to both domestic and international transfers and are intended to align with the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) standards. Non-compliance can lead to enforcement actions or penalties, especially as regulators ramp up scrutiny in 2025.
Suggested read: Explore Travel Rule Implementation
As regulatory scrutiny increases both at the federal and state levels, crypto companies need to step up their game when it comes to spotting suspicious activities and preventing illegal operations. Key focus areas include transaction monitoring and compliance with the Travel Rule requirements. Both are crucial for meeting anti-money laundering (AML) obligations and maintaining the integrity of the operations.
Transaction monitoring enables crypto businesses to track user activity in real time and flag unusual or high-risk transactions based on behavioral patterns, geolocation, asset types, and more. This is especially important in 2025, as regulators now expect platforms to go beyond simple identity verification and adopt risk-based approaches aligned with the Bank Secrecy Act and FinCEN guidance.
Sumsub’s Transaction Monitoring solution leverages customizable rules and dynamic risk scoring to help platforms detect and respond to suspicious activity effectively. It streamlines compliance and reduces manual review workload.
Additionally, the Travel Rule solution is a complete compliance platform built to support virtual asset transfers both within the US and internationally. It is a proprietary protocol that enables secure, real-time exchange of required originator and beneficiary information, fully aligned with the FATF guidelines and FinCEN expectations.
Sumsub’s platform is more than just for domestic use. It works with four of the top global Travel Rule systems, allowing for seamless connections with partners around the world. As a result, you can make compliant transfers even if the recipient’s VASP is located outside the US.
Many US-based firms rely on closed domestic networks that do not connect to international VASPs, which creates compliance blind spots for outbound transfers. The Travel Rule solution eliminates that limitation by bridging the gap between US operations and the global crypto ecosystem. It enables businesses to scale across borders without compromising on regulatory compliance.
Yes, cryptocurrency is legal in the US, but it is subject to both federal and state regulations that vary by activity and jurisdiction.
Multiple agencies share oversight, including the SEC, CFTC, FinCEN, and IRS. Each focuses on different aspects, such as securities, commodities, AML compliance, and taxation.
Yes, if crypto exchanges operate as money transmitters or engage in certain activities, they must register with FinCEN and often obtain state-specific licenses.
States vary widely—some, like Wyoming, are crypto-friendly with tailored frameworks, while others, like New York, impose strict licensing through regulations like the BitLicense.
Crypto businesses must implement identity verification, customer due diligence, transaction monitoring, and reporting systems in line with FinCEN and BSA guidelines.
A license may be required if a business offers fiat transactions, custodial services, stablecoin issuance, or money transmission. However, a license may not be necessary if a business only handles crypto-to-crypto trades or personal transactions, and the state does not mandate one. Given the variation in regulations, it’s crucial to review both federal and state guidelines to ensure compliance.
In 2025, the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) dropped its expanded “broker” definition, easing reporting rules for DeFi platforms. However, crypto businesses still must comply with federal and state licensing, AML, and KYC requirements.