AML Laws and Regulations in the US 2024—What Has Changed?
Learn how financial institutions can stay AML-compliant in the United States. Explore recent regulatory changes and how businesses can ensure a smooth onboarding process.
Learn how financial institutions can stay AML-compliant in the United States. Explore recent regulatory changes and how businesses can ensure a smooth onboarding process.
The United States is a leader in the fight against money laundering and the financing of terrorism. Still, up to $300 billion is laundered through the US annually.
The US was one of the first countries in the world to make money laundering a federal crime with its Money Laundering Control Act of 1986 (Public Law 99-570). Today, the US is a member of the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) and has a strong AML/CFT framework that imposes heavy penalties for noncompliance. Just recently, in October 2024, TD Bank was hit with a record $3 billion fine over money laundering.
To avoid severe penalties and keep reputation clean, financial institutions must know the relevant AML requirements in the US and understand how to stay compliant. We’ve come up with the following guidelines to help.
The following institutions must comply with AML regulations in the US and maintain risk-based AML programs:
Foreign subsidiaries of US financial institutions must also comply with United States anti-money laundering laws.
US AML laws are increasingly targeting cryptocurrency providers due to their role in money laundering and illicit finance, as these platforms offer greater anonymity.
For instance, the Bank Secrecy Act (BSA) requires cryptocurrency exchanges and wallet providers classified as Money Services Businesses (MSBs) to implement risk-based AML programs, conduct Customer Due Diligence (CDD), and report suspicious activity. Recent developments include proposed rules to regulate cryptocurrency mixers and ongoing enforcement by agencies like FinCEN, the SEC, and CFTC. These efforts aim to strengthen crypto regulations in traditional financial sectors while addressing complex challenges, such as anonymity and cross-border transactions.
Check out this detailed guide to learn how the crypto industry is regulated in the USA: What is the FATF Travel Rule? The Ultimate Guide to Compliance (2024)
The main US financial regulator and Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU) is the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) which operates under the authority of the US Department of the Treasury.
FinCEN oversees all financial institutions in the US to prevent money laundering and the financing of terrorism. Its responsibilities involve the collection of transaction data from local companies and distribution of that data for law enforcement purposes. FinCEN can partner with law enforcement agencies at the state and federal levels to assist in criminal investigations. The watchdog also cooperates with its international counterparts in order to fight global financial crimes.
The Office of Financial Assets Control (OFAC) works to identify already known criminals and enforce economic sanctions on countries, individuals and legal persons that are engaged in criminal/illegal activities and actions. The regulator as a watchdog oversees US sanctions programs to ensure that companies comply with the trade prohibitions on targets inscribed in the relevant sanctions lists.
There are a number of sanctions lists in the US, but the main one is the Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked Persons List (SDN) published by the US Department of Treasury. The SDN list includes the names of persons designated for economic sanctions within a US global sanctions program.
The US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) plays a key role in combating money laundering by enforcing AML regulations for securities brokers, dealers, and investment advisors. Under the Bank Secrecy Act (BSA), the SEC ensures these entities implement risk-based AML programs, conduct Customer Due Diligence (CDD), and file Suspicious Activity Reports (SARs). The SEC also collaborates with FinCEN and other agencies to oversee compliance and investigate securities-related money laundering. It focuses on risks in areas such as cryptocurrency, market manipulation, and unregistered securities offerings.
The Federal Reserve Board (FRB) oversees AML compliance for banks and financial institutions (members of the Federal Reserve System) under its supervision, ensuring they adhere to the Bank Secrecy Act (BSA) and related regulations. The FRB examines banks for compliance during routine inspections, focusing on policies for detecting and preventing money laundering and terrorist financing. It also collaborates with other federal and state agencies, such as FinCEN, to enforce AML laws and share financial intelligence.
The primary AML legislation in the US is the Bank Secrecy Act (BSA). Implemented in 1970, the BSA imposes reporting and record-keeping obligations on US financial institutions (including banks, brokerage firms, insurance companies, etc.) in order to prevent criminals using their products and services to launder the proceeds of their crime.
Under the Bank Secrecy Act (BSA) and related anti-money laundering laws, financial institutions must:
In most cases, financial institutions are obliged to collect tax identification numbers of US citizens or residents, such as social security numbers (SSNs), together with their full name, date of birth, and address.
An SSN is a unique 9-digit number directly linked to an individual’s identity. If stolen or forged, a criminal can gain illegitimate access to a person’s bank accounts, credit cards, tax and employment history, and other private information.
Sumsub’s SSN check can prevent forgery and make your KYC flow efficient.
After 9-11, the US passed the USA Patriot Act as an amendment to the BSA. The Patriot Act empowered US law enforcement agencies with further authorities when investigating suspected terrorism financing.
In particular, the Patriot Act imposes a range of Customer Due Diligence (CDD) and screening responsibilities on US companies, with a focus on international transactions. The Patriot Act imposes criminal and financial penalties for persons found to be in violation of CFT compliance regulations.
In 2021, the US introduced the Anti-Money Laundering Act (AMLA) 2020, the most notable reform to the country’s AML/CFT legislation since the Patriot Act.
Its purpose is to manage the threats posed by new technologies and criminal methodologies. The regulatory measures introduced by the AMLA include broadened international information sharing rules, new beneficial ownership requirements to prevent the misuse of shell companies, increase penalties for money laundering and enforce new whistleblower protections.
As a FATF member state, the US requires financial institutions to take a risk-based approach to AML/CFT. This means that they must conduct a Know Your Customer (KYC) assessment to identify clients at the onboarding process, establish the level of compliance risk they wish to tolerate and deploy AML/CFT measures in proportion to that risk.
Another important procedure for certain businesses in the US is the Customer Identification Program (CIP). CIP has to be implemented by all banks, credit unions, saving and loan associations operating in the US as part of their BSA/AML compliance program. Check this detailed guide on CIP to understand who must comply with CIP and how it’s different from KYC.
A good AML compliance program for a US institution must include the following procedures:
Under the risk-based approach to AML/CFT, the US requires firms to impose on their higher-risk customers Enhanced Due Diligence (EDD) checks/make them subject to EDD measures. The EDD process includes a larger degree of AML/CFT scrutiny, stronger identity verification measures, and additional checks such as checks on the source of customer funds and wealth.
Criminal cases may be reported in the news before official sources confirm them. Accordingly, the EDD process may also include adverse media screening, which requires financial institutions to search news sources for the customer’s involvement in negative stories (including terrorism, terrorist financing, financial crime, organized crime, kidnapping, corruption, and tax crime).
Suggested read: 5 Best Practices for Adverse Media Screening
Financial institutions must submit a Suspicious Activity Report (SAR) using a special Bank Secrecy Act BSA E-Filing System no later than 30 calendar days after the date when signs of money laundering were initially detected.
In 2024, several updates to the USA’s Anti-Money Laundering (AML) laws were proposed or implemented, focusing on modernizing compliance requirements and addressing emerging financial threats. Key changes include:
Beneficial Ownership Information (BOI) rule enforcement:
The Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) began enforcing the Beneficial Ownership Information (BOI) rule. This rule mandates businesses to report information about individuals with significant control or ownership stakes (at least 25%). This aims to close loopholes that previously allowed the misuse of opaque corporate structures for money laundering. Compliance is required by millions of businesses, with phased access for government agencies and financial institutions.
Proposed rule for AML program standardization:
FinCEN introduced a proposed rule to harmonize AML and Countering the Financing of Terrorism (CFT) programs across various financial institutions (e.g., banks, broker-dealers, and MSBs). This includes:
Increased focus on cryptocurrency:
FinCEN issued a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking targeting cryptocurrency mixers, designating them as potential money laundering tools. This would impose stricter obligations under the Bank Secrecy Act, reflecting the increasing regulatory focus on the crypto sector. The SEC’s ongoing legal actions against major crypto platforms (e.g., Coinbase) will further shape the AML landscape for digital assets.
Broader compliance updates:
The new rules seek to align AML obligations across all financial institutions, eliminating disparities in regulatory requirements. This approach emphasizes consistency while maintaining robust mechanisms to combat financial crimes.
Criminal penalty
The maximum BSA-related criminal penalty is $250,000 and up to five years’ imprisonment. However, if the violation is part of a pattern of conduct involving more than $100,000 over a 12-month period and involves the violation of another US criminal law, the penalty increases to $500,000 and up to 10 years’ imprisonment.
Civil penalty
The maximum BSA-related civil penalty may also differ. For example, federal banking regulators have the authority to impose penalties from $5,000 per violation to $1,000,000, or 1% of the assets of a financial institution, whichever is greater, for every day that the violation occurs.
Other federal watchdogs and self-regulatory organizations have independent civil penalty authorities. Penalties are mainly assessed for AML compliance program deficiencies, failures to file suspicious activity reports (SARs), and the presence of other BSA violations.
AML requirements in the US mandate financial institutions to implement a compliance program including risk-based policies, customer due diligence (CDD), suspicious activity reporting (SAR), recordkeeping, independent audits, employee training, and adherence to FinCEN’s regulations under the Bank Secrecy Act (BSA).
The ‘6 Pillars’ of an AML policy in the US are core components of a compliance program, which include risk assessment, written internal policies, procedures and controls, an appointment designated compliance officer, ongoing training for employees, independent testing and auditing, as well as customer due diligence (CDD).
The key AML laws are the Bank Secrecy Act and the Patriot Act.
KYC verification is the process of verifying a customer’s identity to help comply with the AML regulations in the US.
Yes. The US Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) requires financial institutions to comply with KYC standards to prevent criminal activity.