Security Token Offerings: AML and KYC (2024)
Everything you need to know about Security Token Offerings—definition, regulations, and KYC requirements.
Everything you need to know about Security Token Offerings—definition, regulations, and KYC requirements.
Security Token Offerings (STOs) were created due to high demand for regulatory oversight of Initial Coin Offerings (ICOs), which can be used to scam investors. So what exactly is an STO? How are STOs regulated? And what are the KYC/AML requirements for STOs? Let’s get into the finer details.
STOs are a form of fundraising involving the issuance of digital tokens to investors. In many jurisdictions, tokens issued under STOs are considered a security if they represent the right to any financial gain or claim on the issuer. Tokens usually give holders rights similar to those of ordinary securities (for example, sharing, voting, dividends, etc.)
The processes for launching ICOs and STOs are similar. The main difference is based on the characteristics and functions of the issued tokens. For instance, in an ICO, capital is raised by selling utility tokens, which give owners the right to use the company’s product or service once it is developed. In security token offerings (STOs), companies sell tokenized traditional financial instruments—such as, for example, equity where token holders receive rights to future profits.
*The FATF’s Guidance on virtual assets considers ICOs as VASPs in some cases, while the FCA’s Guidance on cryptoassets considers them e-money services.
Most countries have regulations based on local securities laws. However, some jurisdictions haven’t introduced any regulations yet.
Under the Securities Act of 1933, any offer or sale of a security made to US residents must either be registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) or meet exemptions. Here are the most common exemptions:
Regulation D
Except in limited circumstances, purchasers of securities offered pursuant to Rule 504 and Rule 506 receive “restricted” securities, meaning that the securities cannot be sold for at least six months or a year without registering them.
Companies that comply with the requirements of Rule 504 and 506(b) or (c) do not have to register their offering of securities with the SEC, but they must file what is known as a “Form D” electronically with the SEC after they first sell their securities. Form D is a brief notice that includes the names and addresses of the company’s promoters, executive officers, and directors—as well as some details about the offering—but contains little other information about the company.
Regulation S
Regulation S exempts from SEC registration all STO offers and sales that are completed entirely outside the United States and made only to non-US residents.
Regulation A
According to Regulation A, a public offer or sale of eligible securities shall be exempt from the registration requirements of the Securities Act in the following cases:
Regulation CF
Regulation Crowdfunding (CF) exempts from registration the sale of up to $5 million of securities in a 12-month period. It sets no investment limits for accredited investors. Non-accredited investors are subject to investment limits based on their greater annual income and net worth. Additionally, securities purchased in a crowdfunding transaction generally cannot be resold for one year.
There are no specific regulations for STOs, however a number of the EU-level regulations may apply to STOs in some cases. For example, the EU Prospectus Regulation applies if STO tokens are characterized as transferable securities under MiFID II (unless certain exceptions apply). The EU Prospectus Regulation sets out the regime for the prospectus that must be published by a company when its securities are offered to the public or are admitted for trading on a regulated market.
All in all, the regulation of STOs across Europe may follow one of the following approaches:
The MiCA does not apply to crypto-assets (which qualify as financial instruments within the meaning of the MiFID II), deposits, funds (except if they qualify as e-money tokens), securitization positions, non-life or life insurance products and pension products. By way of example, investment services and ancillary services in relation to securities tokens which qualify as transferable securities under the MiFID II will not be subject to requirements under the MiCA.
Regarding the Asia-Pacific region, it’s important to discuss the current regulatory framework in Singapore and Hong Kong. Singapore regulators focus on the following assets:
On November 14 2017, MAS first released A Guide to Digital Token Offerings (“Guide”), following its clarification on August 1, 2017. This established that if a digital token constitutes a product regulated under the securities law administered by MAS, the offer or issue of digital tokens must comply with the relevant laws. The Guide was last updated on May 26, 2020. There is no separate definition for security token offerings (STOs) and initial coin offerings (“ICOs”) in the Guide; only the generic terms “digital token offering” are used throughout.
Digital tokens offered or issued may be regulated by MAS if they are “capital markets products” under the SFA. Capital markets products include any securities, units in a collective investment scheme, derivatives contracts, and spot foreign exchange contracts for purposes of leveraged foreign exchange trading.
According to the Guide, to determine if the digital token falls under “capital markets products”, MAS must examine the structure and characteristics of, including the rights attached to, a digital token in determining if the digital token is a type of capital markets product under the SFA.
A digital token may constitute:
For offers of digital tokens that constitute securities, securities-based derivatives contracts, or units in a CIS, the same regulatory regimes apply under Part XIII of the SFA. Therefore, offers must be made in or accompanied by a prospectus that is prepared in accordance with the SFA and is registered with MAS (“Prospectus Requirements”).
In addition, if such an offer is made in relation to units in a CIS, the CIS is subject to authorization or recognition requirements. An authorized CIS or a recognized CIS under the SFA must comply with investment restrictions and business conduct requirements (“Authorization/ Recognition Requirements”).
Exemption
Certain offers may nevertheless be exempt from the Prospectus Requirements and,
in the case of units in a CIS, the Authorization/ Recognition Requirements, where,
amongst others:
Some of the requirements provided by the Guide include:
Hong Kong is a prominent APAC jurisdiction leading the charge in embracing crypto/ blockchain technology—and recent policy directions from the Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) and Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) show its dedication to providing clear regulations in this industry.
On November 29, 2023, the President of The Hong Kong Securities & Futures Professionals Association, Mr. Chen Zhihua, wrote to the Financial Secretary of Hong Kong in “Opinions on the 2024-25 Budget” suggesting the government consider launching an initial coin offering (ICO) mechanism.
From a regulatory perspective, the Hong Kong government has been proactive in setting legal framework for the crypto industry. on June 1, 2023, Hong Kong implemented a new licensing regime for VATPs, overseen by the Securities and Futures Commission (SFC).
For VATPs (for non-security tokens) under the AMLO regime, a handbook and guideline were issued to fill the regulatory gap that existed prior to that:
Regulatory framework
The SFC viewed that tokenized securities are fundamentally traditional securities with a tokenization wrapper, hence the existing legal and regulatory requirements governing the traditional securities markets continue to apply to tokenized securities. As such, prospectus and investment public offering regimes will be applied to tokenized securities.
Archetypes of DLT networks
The SFC highlighted that risks may vary depending on the type of DLT network used, and this should be addressed through the implementation of adequate controls. There are several common archetypes of DLT networks noted by the SFC, which include:
The key point to note is that the SFC does not outright reject the use of public permissionless networks—but it pointed out that the heightened cybersecurity risk (practical difficulties recovering their assets or pursuing claims for losses in the event of theft, hacking or other cyberattacks), as well as potentially higher exposures to money laundering and know-your-client issues associated with public permissionless networks.
As securities/issuers of securities, STOs don’t fall under national AML laws. If dealers and brokers are involved by the STO issuer to market the token sale, they must implement AML measures, such as KYC, as these are AML-regulated entities.
Know Your Customer (KYC) is the process of identifying and verifying customers. Regarding STOs, this process covers the following:
The required information can differ across jurisdictions, but here’s a common baseline for verifying STO investors:
To verify an investor’s identity, businesses can use a document issued by an independent and reliable source containing the person’s photo (ID card or a passport).
To verify an investor’s residential address, businesses can use recent utility bills, housing insurance documents, or municipal taxes and bank account statements.
For STO projects, automated verification is the way to go. It reduces onboarding time to a couple of minutes and increases conversion rates (without needing to hire additional employees to control the process).
STOs are a form of fundraising involving the issuance of digital tokens to investors. In many jurisdictions, tokens issued under STOs are considered a security if they represent the right to any financial gain or claim on the issuer.
It depends on the country. The majority of countries have regulations based on local securities laws, whereas others haven’t introduced any frameworks (e.g., China).
Let’s provide examples from the US and the EU. In the US, STOs are regulated by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). Under the Securities Act of 1933, any security offering made to US residents must either be registered with the SEC or be exempted from regulation under the rules of the Act. There are no specific regulations for STOs, however a number of the EU-level regulations may apply to STOs in some cases. For example, the EU Prospectus Regulation applies if STO tokens are characterized as transferable securities under MiFID II (unless certain exceptions apply). The Prospectus Regulation sets out the regime for the prospectus that must be published by a company when its securities are offered to the public or are admitted for trading on a regulated market.
The main difference is based on the characteristics and functions of the issued tokens. For instance, in an ICO, capital is raised by selling utility tokens, which give owners the right to use the company’s product or service once it is developed. In security token offerings (STOs), companies sell tokenized traditional financial instruments—such as equity where token holders receive rights to future profits.